Changes touching this path

• a move becomes a recorded fact instead of a later guess, and the premise this ticket rested on was false: #98's object reuse is keyed by PATH, so a moved path is absent from the outgoing tree at its new key, falls through to put_sealed and gets a fresh address - the same object under a different key was not a fact waiting to be read off the tree, it had to be made true by extending the reuse across the move, and everything else follows from that. The rule is that a move is recorded only when the path's sealed object survives it, so a move whose content also changed in the same capture window shares no object, records nothing and is two rows, while a move and then an edit across two captures of one change composes and reads as one row saying the content also changed. Empty content and any ambiguity are refused for the same reason the whole design exists: zero bytes equal all zero bytes, and choosing between two vanished twins would make a signed fact depend on iteration order. On the boundary the render side compares nothing at all - resolve reads keys and never an address, a visibility or a byte, pinned by running it twice over trees that agree on every key and differ on every address at three unopenable tiers, with a positive control beside it so agreement is not evidence it answers nothing. The capture side compares once: it opens a vanished object with this identity's own keys, fail-closed so an unopenable object is never read or hashed, and pairs only against an addition at an identical visibility and publication tier, with the digest living for one call, never an address, never stored and never on the wire. What a relay newly learns is that two keys held equal ciphertext, which recording a move states in plaintext anyway since tree paths are plaintext at every tier, so it is inherent to the feature rather than the ADR 0004 oracle - written into that ADR rather than left in a message. Renames ride the label seam change_id and authored_at already use: covered by the finalize signature so a relay cannot rewrite a move, never folded into the version id so two peers reaching one tree by different routes still agree on its address, which is why every existing id and signature is unchanged and a v11 store reads with no move recorded. That was tested rather than argued, against a real store built by the shipped binary, where the old move still renders as a delete and an add in the same repo the new one renders as a rename, because inferring the old one would be the equality oracle arriving through the compatibility door. Three further things were wrong and are corrected rather than worked around: ADR 0019 says an additive change bumps the minor and has never described this project, since the minor is still zero and all five additive changes took the major; plan_moves own doc comment claimed the tier is checked before the digest, three lines above code that does the lookup first, when the property actually holds by the stronger route that nothing unopenable enters the index at all; and the empty-content refusal was written on both sides of the pairing, where each made the other unprovable and removing either left the test green - a duplicated guard is not belt and braces, it is two guards neither of which can be shown to be doing anything (#1539) 3c7e029b · dbf3dbe6…

Renames are not followed. loot's tree maps a path to an address, so a rename is a delete and an add. This list is the history of the name, not of the bytes.