Changes touching this path

• the note rule is a refusal on a LOCAL WRITE and the documents now say so in the first sentence a reader meets, because the claim that it is a property of the LANE was false in the direction nobody had checked: ingest inserts on att.verify alone, so a peer prose about a sealed change is stored and printed while the IDENTICAL TEXT FROM THE LOCAL OPERATOR ON THE IDENTICAL CHANGE IS REFUSED. that was built end to end rather than argued - a peer DagRepo not running the seam, a real sync bundle, apply_bundle, and the secret read back in the clear. gating ingest is REJECTED on four counts and the first two decide it: a drop destroys the local holder ONLY EVIDENCE OF A DISCLOSURE THAT ALREADY HAPPENED, at the one party who can act on it with burn, re-seal or rotate, and the remote author already had the plaintext so refusing un-tells nobody; and it would make the lane contents READER-DEPENDENT, where membership today is a property of the BYTES - a signature verifies or it does not, the same answer at every reader - so one peer would keep what its neighbour drops, the dropper would stop forwarding, and the lane would PARTITION. the third count is that it is not even COMPUTABLE where the ingest happens: the attestation loop runs BEFORE change nodes enter the graph, so a first-delivery record has no tree, and a gate that fails closed would refuse the ORDINARY case. the note codec header carried the sharpest error, since that module is the DECODER and a claim that such records cannot exist is exactly backwards there. and tag partial write is made UNREPRESENTABLE rather than documented: attest_all judges every record - role minted, prose gated - and only THEN records them all and persists once, so an annotated create is TWO RECORDS AND ONE ACT and the pre-check is DELETED rather than marked load-bearing. it had been copied from the notes verb along with the sentence saying deleting it costs a message and never the rule, which is true of a verb that writes ONCE and false of one that writes twice - the refusal now leaves NOTHING behind, not even the landmark, verified end to end at 0 landmarks. four mutations with counts read, and the ingest pin fails on its LOCAL-WRITE CONTROL half when the local gate is neutered, so both directions are live in one test (#1855) 2bc8c51a · dbf3dbe6…

Renames are not followed. loot's tree maps a path to an address, so a rename is a delete and an add. This list is the history of the name, not of the bytes.