Changes touching this path

• the notice stops contradicting itself in two places, and both were created by the corrections that fixed the claims they contradict: the retention section was rewritten to say the database rows have no enforced time bound, and the erasure section three screens down still said everything ages out within thirty days - flatly the opposite, and the more flattering of the two. the objecting section said the opt-out is the one cookie this site will ever set, and the sign-in section added in the same pass says Clerk sets session cookies. each sentence was defensible alone; neither survived being read next to its neighbour. ⭐ found by loading the rendered page and reading it, not by any check. this is the same class as the four false statements the review caught, arriving by a different route: there, a sentence disagreed with the code; here, a sentence disagrees with another sentence about the same fact. a test can compare prose to prose, which is what the two new assertions do - the page must not claim the opt-out is the only cookie, and must not say everything ages out - each paired with the positive form so that deleting the sentence is not a way to pass. the wording that replaces them is narrower rather than softer. the opt-out is the only cookie set for anyone who is NOT SIGNED IN, which is true and is the distinction a reader actually needs, and erasure now says the logs age out within the window while the summary counts, which carry nothing about a person, stay as the retention section describes. no claim moved in the flattering direction (#1624) 16ba821b · dbf3dbe6…

Renames are not followed. loot's tree maps a path to an address, so a rename is a delete and an add. This list is the history of the name, not of the bytes.