Changes touching this path

• the last sweep's fix-up, and the item with teeth was a doc that told its reader to make the edit its own route file forbids: the component said it was exported so the route could load it LAZILY, where the route records that lazy was measured and REJECTED at 581 bytes against 270 and says in as many words not to fix it back without re-measuring. It now carries the route's true reason - so a test can render either half without a router - and marks explicitly that this is not a lazy split, pointing at the route for the readings rather than copying its numbers. The receipt showed eight hex characters wearing the class the module reserves for a FULL fingerprint, on the one surface whose whole purpose is an out-of-band fingerprint comparison, with adjacent copy inviting a comparison eight characters cannot support; it now shows the full fingerprint, derived in the accept from the bytes the apply itself re-verified rather than re-shortened in the surface, so the receipt cannot be rendered from the offer the apply was meant to re-check. Dropping the class and keeping eight was rejected because it would make the receipt say LESS about the one thing being checked. Rendered bytes did not really move - three gate builds read the same surface at 199873, 199872 and 199873 against 199872 recorded, and the whole sixty-route spread is minus seven to plus four - so nothing was re-recorded and the two bytes the ticket asked about turn out to be the instrument rather than an unaccounted byte. CONTEXT.md's list of account_of's consumers stops being a third copy and POINTS at the header that owns it, naming the one consumer #1746's own restatement dropped - which is the lesson of this fix-up, since that restatement was itself the remedy for a count-drift finding and drifted in the same way. The budget note is corrected as PROSE with no ceiling and no measurement touched: uniformly on every one of these surfaces was authored from a single weighing, and one surface moved the other way and had its ceiling LOWERED after its page lost six entries. The decline receipt moves into the register module that owns the vocabulary, with an absent-phrase list and a RENDERING control, because an absent-phrase list over copy that never renders proves nothing. And a count of refusals is removed rather than corrected: the numbers are labels for rules and do not line up with the code, since the first propagates from the walk and the fifth leaves from more than one site with different sentences (#1751) 571d3533 · dbf3dbe6…

Renames are not followed. loot's tree maps a path to an address, so a rename is a delete and an add. This list is the history of the name, not of the bytes.